Human Rights Implications of Algorithmic Impact Assessments: Priority Considerations to Guide Effective Development and Use

Human Rights Implications of Algorithmic Impact Assessments: Priority Considerations to Guide Effective Development and Use

Abstract:

The public and private sectors are increasingly turning to the use of algorithmic or artificial intelligence impact assessments (AIAs) as a means to identify and mitigate harms from AI. While promising, lack of clarity on the proper scope, methodology, and best practices for AIAs could inadvertently perpetuate the harms they seek to mitigate, especially to human rights. We explore the emerging integration of the human rights legal framework into AI governance strategies, including the implementation of human rights impacts assessments (HRIAs) to assess AI. The benefits and drawbacks from recent implementations of AIAs and HRIAs to assess AI adopted by the public and private sectors are explored and considered in the context of an emerging trend toward the development of standards, certifications, and regulatory technologies for responsible AI governance practices. We conclude with priority considerations to better ensure that AIAs and their corresponding responsible AI governance strategies live up to their promise.

Read the paper.

author/date: Nonnecke & Dawson | Oct 21 2021
teaser text: Lack of clarity on the proper scope, methodology, and best practices for algorithmic or AI impact assessments could inadvertently perpetuate the harms they seek to mitigate.
Last updated on 10/25/2021